{"id":596,"date":"2025-03-13T16:07:28","date_gmt":"2025-03-13T16:07:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/?page_id=596"},"modified":"2025-03-13T16:13:06","modified_gmt":"2025-03-13T16:13:06","slug":"ranking","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/ranking\/","title":{"rendered":"Ranking"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>When I started this exercise (as a <a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/tomhartley.me.uk\/post\/3laukke2op32v\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/tomhartley.me.uk\/post\/3laukke2op32v\">Bluesky thread<\/a>) I already knew that Ranking the Beatles&#8217; songs was not a very realistic thing to attempt. In several places in the original thread, and here on the blog site, I have explained some of the issues and why I still carried it out, but in essence:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<blockquote class=\"wp-block-quote is-layout-flow wp-block-quote-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><strong><mark style=\"background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)\" class=\"has-inline-color has-secondary-color\"><a href=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/tomhartley.me.uk\/post\/3lb3riqnksl2y\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/bsky.app\/profile\/tomhartley.me.uk\/post\/3lb3riqnksl2y\">Ranking songs<\/a> or any kind of art is not just difficult, it\u2019s crazy. The whole point is to make something unique and original. To rank them is to miss that point. <\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><mark style=\"background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)\" class=\"has-inline-color has-secondary-color\">Still it\u2019s useful to deal with things one at a time and the ordering creates a bit of mystery and tension.<\/mark><\/strong> <strong><mark style=\"background-color:rgba(0, 0, 0, 0)\" class=\"has-inline-color has-secondary-color\">(Bluesky thread, November 2024)<\/mark><\/strong><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n<p>So I decided to rank the songs &#8211; it will be more interesting than a random sequence. But as I know, deep down, that any ranking is inherently flawed, I have not attempted to optimize the scheme for accuracy; it&#8217;s just a preliminary practical step to sorting the songs so that they can be considered one at a time. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>I am a bit nerdy and for various reasons (for example, choosing songs to cover or learn for an open mic) I&#8217;d already set up a spreadsheet with all the Beatles&#8217; songs and various ratings in it. It was a pretty crude way to identify what I liked about different songs, and includes things like &#8220;lyrics&#8221;, &#8220;melody&#8221;, &#8220;performance&#8221; and optional bonus points for things like &#8220;bass&#8221; and &#8220;harmonies&#8221;. I <a href=\"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/brief-diversion\/\" data-type=\"post\" data-id=\"166\">later<\/a> added in some old MP3 &#8220;star&#8221; ratings I&#8217;d used to help choose songs for playlists. Then I came up with a very crude way to combine the points into an overall score.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The results do give some kind of rough ordering, but don&#8217;t even reflect my own taste very accurately, never mind representing an objective evaluation of the merit of each song.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Here are some other pages where I talk about ranking if you are still interested:<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ul class=\"wp-block-list\">\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/about\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/about\/\">About<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/brief-diversion\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/brief-diversion\/\">A Brief Diversion<\/a><\/li>\n\n\n\n<li><a href=\"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/158-ill-cry-instead\/\" data-type=\"link\" data-id=\"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/158-ill-cry-instead\/\">I&#8217;ll Cry Instead<\/a><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>When I started this exercise (as a Bluesky thread) I already knew that Ranking the Beatles&#8217; songs was not a very realistic thing to attempt. In several places in the original thread, and here on the blog site, I have explained some of the issues and why I still carried it out, but in essence: [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-596","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/596","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=596"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/596\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":599,"href":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/596\/revisions\/599"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/tomhartley.me.uk\/beatles\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=596"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}